Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Cmr Constr. & Roofing of Texas
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 22, 2019No. S-18-419PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeavican, C.J.
**620 *331 INTRODUCTION
The Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court concluded that CMR Construction & Roofing of Texas, LLC (CMR), was a statutory employer under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-116 (Reissue 2010) of the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act, 1 thus requiring it to compensate Juan Martinez for injuries sustained while acting as an employee of Rene Menjivar, a CMR subcontractor.
CMR challenges the compensation court's determination under § 48-116 of what constitutes the term "employer" and alleges the compensation court lacked personal jurisdiction over Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Texas Mutual),…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Peay v. BellSouth Medical Assistance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Terrance Hirsch and Margaret Hirsch v. Blue Cross, Blue Shield of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Aboytes-Mosqueda v. LFA Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Rogers v. Jack's Supper ClubNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Bortolotti v. Universal Terrazzo & Tile Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Prinz v. Omaha OperationsNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
- Addington v. McDonald ApiaryNebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.