Legal Opinion
Layton v. Merit System Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 14, 1976No. Civ. 47831PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.
Petitioner Adah T. Layton sought mandate in the trial court (pursuant to Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) to compel respondent, Merit System Commission of the City of Pomona, California, to set aside its determination upholding the two-day suspension of petitioner; she also sought reimbursement of salary withheld during the same time period. Respondent both demurred to the petition and filed an answer. After a hearing on the demurrer (which hearing is unreported to us), the trial court found for the respondent Merit System Commission, and dismissed petitioner’s action…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Walker v. City of San GabrielCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Erlich v. Municipal Court of Beverly Hills Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Parker v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- M Restaurants, Inc. v. San Francisco Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers, Bartenders, Hotel, Motel & Club Service Workers & Dining Room Employees UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Pipkin v. Bd. of Supervisors of Shasta Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Vollstedt v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.