Legal Opinion

In re City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Markewich, J.

The issue before us is whether, in this proceeding in eminent domain, a claimant using a unique idea to bring about increased rental returns is to be deprived of the benefit of that idea by having a lesser hypothetical rent roll substituted for the actual rent roll. The subject 10-story, loft-type building was acquired in 1964 by the claimant from the City of New York for $340,000. For the next 10 years, it was used for storage of records and office equipment by approximately 100 tenants. The city’s theory advanced in this condemnation proceeding to reacquire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keator v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  3. Hicks Realty Associates v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Town of Riverhead v. Saffals Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API