Tully v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 23 — INDICTMENT APPEAL PROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Criminal Code, secs. 15, 18,121, 123, 129. Wharton’s Crim. Law, 73, 147, 773. General Statutes, chap. 29, p. 318. Roseoe’s Crim. Evidence, pp. 172, 173. Illinois Digest, 370, Haddock v. Waterman. General Statutes, secs. 5, 6, pp. 318, 342. Coke on Littleton, 52 a. 1 Bishop’s Crim.
Read the full summary
Case 23 — INDICTMENT APPEAL PROM SCOTT CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Criminal Code, secs. 15, 18,121, 123, 129. Wharton’s Crim. Law, 73, 147, 773. General Statutes, chap. 29, p. 318. Roseoe’s Crim. Evidence, pp. 172, 173. Illinois Digest, 370, Haddock v. Waterman. General Statutes, secs. 5, 6, pp. 318, 342. Coke on Littleton, 52 a. 1 Bishop’s Crim. Law, secs. 70, 74, 305, 487, 551, 560, 561, 488, 490, 227. 3 Greenleaf’s Evidence, section 49. 2 Duvall, 89, Pike v. Commonwealth. 3 Met. 5, Commonwealth v. Perrigo. 3 Met. 14, Burns v. Commonwealth. 3 Met. 19, Jane v. Commonwealth. 3 Met. 226, Commonwealth…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE PRYOR
delivered the opinion oe the court.
The appellant, H. B. Tully, appeared in the Scott Circuit Court to answer the following indictment, found against him by the grand jury of Scott County: “The grand jury of Scott County, in the name and by the authority of the commonwealth of Kentucky, accuse Henry B. Tully of the offense of being accessory after the fact to the commission of a felony committed as follows, viz.: The said Henry B. Tully, on the 6th of March, 1874, in the county aforesaid, willfully and unlawfully aided and abetted Benjamin Osborn, whom he knew to be guilty of a…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Mulligan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
- Greer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Maddox v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Huckaby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Commonwealth v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.