Commonwealth v. Bowman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 9 —INDICTMENT— APPEAL FROM PENDLETON CIRCUIT COURT. Indictment sets out a public offense, therefore judgment cannot be arrested. (Section 276, Criminal Code.)
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Quigley
At the April term, 1894, of the Pendleton Circuit Court, the grand jury of Pendleton county indicted the appellee Bowman for forging and altering a promissory note, committed in manner and form as follows : “The said Stonewall Bowman, on the-day of December, 1892, in the county and State aforesaid and before the finding of this indictment, did falsely, knbwingly, fraudulently and feloniously and, with the wicked design to defraud, forge and alter an instrument purporting to be the promissory note of W. Y. Morris and Jas. J. Brown for ten dollars, dated December 26, 1892, and payable to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tully v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Stowers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greer v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- State v. SwanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Duncan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
- Kinnaird v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Wallace v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.