Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 12, 2002No. CR98-0486-16; A106595PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. His principal assignment of error is that the trial court should not have given an instruction permitting the jury to find that he was under the influence of intoxicants, even though he had ingested a relatively small quantity of alcohol, because he was more susceptible to the intoxicating effects of alcohol due to his physical condition. We agree that the court erred in giving that instruction and reverse and remand for a new trial.

The relevant facts are undisputed. A police officer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. HuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. State v. RollerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. AvilaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. GibbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. BashamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. RichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API