State v. Huck
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for acquittal 2 and in giving an instruction to the jury. We reverse and remand.
On June 11,1988, at approximately 3:30 a.m., Deputy Sheriffs Poetter and Morrissey saw defendant and another person, Southworth, standing on the side of a road. Defendant was attempting to start a motorcycle. Poetter asked defendant if he had been operating the motorcycle. Defendant said “yes” and that he had lost control and had had an accident. Poetter noticed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. FlemingOregon Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. McFeronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. RollerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.