Legal Opinion

State Ex Inf. Thompson Ex Rel. Pugh v. Bright

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 9, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid E. Blair, J.

This is a proceeding in quo warranto in the Circuit Court of Ray County, attacking the validity of the proceedings attending the organization of Consolidated School District No. 2 of Ray and Carroll Counties, and seeking to oust respondents as directors of such consolidated school district. From a judgment sustaining the validity of such proceedings and denying the ouster, relators have appealed.

The appeal was granted to the Kansas City Court of Appeals and that court transferred the case to this court. Counsel for- relators and respondents filed a stipulation *n ^ie Court of Appeals agreeing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Kimbrell v. People's Ice, Storage & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Frisby ex rel. Frisby v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. State ex inf. Sutton v. FasseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. State ex rel. Frisby v. HillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. State ex rel. School Districts Nos. 52 & 53 v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WymoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  2. State v. EganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. State on the Information of Mitchell v. HeathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. State v. Pretended Consolidated School District Number OneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. McGregory v. GaskillSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API