Legal Opinion
Finn v. Krieger Shoe Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, first district, in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtKelby, J.
The action is to recover rent and is based upon a written lease between the parties. The lease is dated August 25, 1909, and lets the premises 285-287 Jay street, Brooklyn, for a term of three years from January.!, 1910, to January 1,1913, at the yearly rent of $3,600:
The lease contains the following clause:
“And the said party of the first part (plaintiff) does further covenant and agree that at the expiration of said term the party of the second part (defendant) shall have an option to obtain a further lease from the party of the second (sic) part of said premises for a period of five (5)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kennedy v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Burns v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Probst v. . Rochester Steam Laundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Pflum v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Doyle v. Hamilton Fish Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- James Pinto Photography, Ltd. v. SheppardCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006