Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Hamilton Fish Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Alexander Doyle, 'from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 12th day of July, 1910, upon the! decision of. the court rendered after a trial at the New York Trial Term, a jury having been waived, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 29th day of June, 1910, denying the plaintiff’s motion to open the case to introduce further testimony.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J. :

Appeal from judgment for defendant. The controversy relates to the rights of the parties, as tenant and landlord respectively, under a lease which by its terms expired oh November 1, 1907. At its inception this controversy involved only a small sum of money, insignificant in amount compared to the value of the property involved. Neither party, however, was willing to give way to the other, and as a result the controversy has how attained larger proportions. It arose over the landlord’s covenant to renew the lease of the land, or to pay for the buildings erected thereon, which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elterman v. . HymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Zorkowski v. . AstorNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Van Beuren v. . WotherspoonNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia University v. KalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Trustees of Columbia University v. KalvinNew York Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Martin v. SchumacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Doyle v. . Hamilton Fish CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Finn v. Krieger Shoe Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API