Legal Opinion
Iida v. Allied Signal, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided June 1, 1994No. 92-00706PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON ISSUE OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Esther Iida filed the present action on September 28, 1992, individually and as legal representative of the estate Kenji Iida, to recover damages arising out of Mr. Iida’s illness and death. The complaint alleges that Mr. Iida died from pulmonary disease caused by his exposure to automotive products containing asbestos manufáctured by Allied Signal and other defendants. Plaintiff asserts claims on behalf of the estate on a variety of products liability and warranty theories.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holmes v. ACandS, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Miller v. Estate of SperlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- In Re Hawaii Federal Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1994
- Gast v. Sung Ki KwakDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2005
- Miller v. Estate of SperlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001