Legal Opinion

McKay v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 1931No. 28,007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This action on a policy of fire insurance went to a jury and a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for judgment notivithstanding or a new trial.

The policy covers a building insured as a dwelling and was issued February 18, 1925, to one Mullner. Although the policy did not so state, he was insured as a mortgagee. Neither then nor thereafter did the, owner or mortgagor become a beneficiary of the insurance. September 17, 1927, Mullner, with the consent of defendant, the insurer, assigned the policy to one Meyers, another mortgagee. The building was burned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Walker v. Queen Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Lett v. Guardian Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Sterling Fire Insurance v. BeffreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Baker v. Monumental Savings & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New York Casualty Co. v. SazenskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Nobbe v. Equity Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  3. Border State Bank of Greenbush v. Farmers Home GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. United States v. Fishing Vessel Mary AnnDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
  5. Ferraiolo v. Commonwealth InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API