Legal Opinion

Border State Bank of Greenbush v. Farmers Home Group

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 2000No. C3-00-904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge

Appellant Farmers Home Group (Insurer) challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment to respondent Border State Bank of Greenbush (Bank). Because we find no error in the district court’s application of law, we affirm.

FACTS

Bank sold property to Louis Haupt on a contract for deed in 1991. Insurer issued a policy covering the property against fire loss. The policy named Haupt as insured and Bank as “mortgagee,” which was defined in the policy to include contract-for-deed vendors. Insurer knew that Bank was a contract-for-deed vendor. The policy provided that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Phalen Park State Bank v. ReevesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. 495 CORP. v. NJ Ins. Underwriting Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Reitzner v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Farmers & Merchants Savings Bank v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Conrad Bros. v. John Deere Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Aurelius v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. Western National Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Aurelius v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API