Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Verticelli

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue in this case is whether the Commonwealth satisfied the corpus delicti rule so as to permit the admission of appellant’s statements to police. In affirming the judgment of sentence, we consider the rule, its purpose and its impact.

In the late afternoon hours of March 26, 1994, Officer Robert Burkhardt of the New Britain Township police department responded to the radio call of a motorcycle accident. At the scene, Burkhardt observed a motorcycle lying partially on the road and partially on the lawn of a residence. Upon investigation, Burkhardt noticed that the motorcycle…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. BurnsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. NasutiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. J.Z.S.Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API