Legal Opinion

Greenspan v. Third Federal Savings & Loan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2008No. 89850PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Christine T. McMonagle, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Gary A. Greenspan, filed a complaint for money had and received and unjust enrichment against Third Federal Savings and Loan. The gravamen of his claim was that Third Federal charged him, and routinely charged its other mortgage loan customers, a “document preparation” fee of approximately $300. He further alleged that the preparation of the loan documents constituted the unauthorized practice of law. He sought to recoup money paid by him for document preparation relating to a $38,000 loan taken from Third Federal in 2002, and secured upon his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Whaley v. Franklin County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Cocon, Inc. v. Botnick Building Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Miami Valley Hospital v. CombsOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Foss v. BerlinOhio Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Greenspan v. Third Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API