Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 12, 2018No. Case No. 2:18–cv–00688–MMD–NJKPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe's Report and Recommendation ("R & R" or "Recommendation") (ECF No. 20), recommending that this case be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants had until June 7, 2018, to file an objection. (Id.at 20.) To date, no objection to the R & R has been filed. Accordingly, the Court adopts the R & R with respect to remand.
1 This Court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where a party…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Apilado v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Bank of America, N.A.v. Fidelity National Title Group, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2022
- Carl White v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Cunningham v. StanfillDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.