Legal Opinion

Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Thaxton

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 11, 1934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.

Charles Melvin Thaxton was employed by the Riverside and Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc., on April 27, 1932, as an electrician. His superior, in official position, was J. A. Guy, who was the chief electrician and superintendent of electric power and light. The mills maintain light and power lines in the village of Schoolfield, adjoining the city of Danville. Both the light and power lines were strung or carried on the same poles, which were concrete. The light wires carried 110 voltage and the power wires 2,300 voltage. The current for the light wires was con trolled by a switch at the power…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. King v. Empire Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1927
  3. Lobdell Car Wheel Co. v. SubielskiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1924
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. GreerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Stockdale v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spruill v. C. W. Wright Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  2. Mills v. Virginia Electric and Power CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. Uninsured Employer's Fund v. KeppelCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  4. Brockway v. EasterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  5. Melvin L. Layne v. Crist Electrical Contractor, Inc. and Assurance Services CorporationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API