Legal Opinion

Newark Live Poultry Co. v. Fauer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 29, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment under review is affirmed, with costs, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

There were, however, grounds for reversal urged in the court below which are not presented and argued here.

They were, error in the charge of the trial court, and refusal to charge a request of the defendant below.

Upon affirming upon the opinion of the Supreme Court we are not passing upon the foregoing grounds of appeal.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Donges, • Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Batka, Francis J. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. Armel v. CrewickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Metric Investment, Inc. v. PattersonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Claus v. BrodheadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. NJ MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. DorseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960