Legal Opinion

Townsend Rabinowitz Pantaleoni & Valente, P.C. v. Holland Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 28, 1986No. 85 Civ. 5523 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Townsend Rabinowitz Pantaleoni & Valente, P.C. (“Townsend”), brought *672this diversity action to recover a balance allegedly due from defendants Holland Industries, Inc. (“Holland”) and Michael Margolies (“Margolies”). Margolies now brings a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., for lack of subject matter jurisdiction asserting that no diversity of citizenship exists. For the reasons discussed below, it is not possible to determine .Margolies’ domicile. Accordingly, Townsend’s motion for further discovery is granted.

Townsend is a New York law…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. TEXAS v. FLORIDA Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. George S. Krasnov v. Brendan DinanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. Anand Prakash v. American UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  4. Neeta Webb v. Robert E. Nolan, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  5. Bache Halsey Stuart Inc. v. NammDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brignoli v. Balch, Hardy & Scheinman, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Noreiga v. Lever Bros. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Greer v. Fox CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API