Legal Opinion

State v. Holt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1969No. 68-146PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Evidence against the defendant included his identification by the victim of the assault as her assailant and a description, by the victim and by another girl who witnessed the abduction, of the automobile being driven by the abductor, which description corresponded with the automobile belonging to defendant. The abduction took place from a sidewalk in the city of Hamilton; and testimony by the defendant and a service station attendant placed defendant and his automobile in the general vicinity of the abduction near the time it occurred.

Defendant has four principal complaints. He asserts…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Conchin v. El Paso & Southwestern RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Blaine v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Ottgen v. GareyOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BuellOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BaylessOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. BennerOhio Supreme Court · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API