Legal Opinion

Manock v. Amos D. Bridge's Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 3, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

This is a proceeding to recover compensation under chapter 178 of the Public Laws. By the terms of that statute recovery of compensation thereunder is limited to employees of the defendant, or those claiming through them, or because of their status when injured. Brawn v. Company, 82 N. H. 78. This fundamental requirement is conceded by the plaintiff, and his claim is based upon the proposition that the essential relation of the parties could be found upon the evidence in the case.

The facts are not in dispute. The defendant was engaged upon a road building contract, and hired from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  2. Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Centrello's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Abbott Worsted Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. O'Brien v. Washington National InsuranceHudson County Superior Court · 1952
  3. Newell v. MoreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  4. Newell v. MoreauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API