Legal Opinion

Ogunsalu v. Roadway Express, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 20, 2003No. Nos. 02-55543, 02-55651; D.C. No. CV-00-01771-TJWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Cornelius O. Ogunsalu appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment and denial of motions for reconsideration in his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review summary judgment de novo and reconsideration orders for an abuse of discretion. Ray v. Henderson, 217 F.3d 1234, 1239 (9th Cir.2000); Sch. Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.1993). We affirm.

The district court properly determined that Ogunsalu failed to set forth a prima facie case of employment discrimination because he failed to present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. William J. Ray v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Hashimoto v. DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Byrd v. GuessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API