Legal Opinion

Simo v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile Employees, Southwest District Council

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2003No. 01-55937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D.W. NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

This suit arises out of a contentious labor struggle at a garment factory in San Bernardino, California. Twenty-five garment workers (“the workers”) brought suit against their union and its officials after the union engaged in secondary pressure to remove work from their factory. The workers alleged that their own union retaliated against them because they sought to have it decertified, in breach of the duty of fair representation (“DFR”), and that the union and the individual defendants initiated a campaign of harassment and intimidation constituting…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ogunsalu v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Simo v. Union Of Needletrades, Industrial & Textile EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API