Legal Opinion

Louisiana Sugar Refining Co. v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 1894No. 1456PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

— Appellants, by means of garnishment severally sued out and afterward consolidated without objection, attacked as fraudulent and void a trust deed or chattel mortgage in the usual form, made December 22,1890, by Bateman & Bro., a firm doing a large business as wholesale grocers at Fort Worth, which in terms conveyed their entire stock of goods, of the invoice value of about $135,000, to W. M. Harrison and D. H. Kernaghan, in trust, for the purpose of securing the payment of the several debts of the various creditors therein named, aggregating in round numbers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. A. S. Valentine & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Haas v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Mixon v. SymondsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. McLaughlin v. Carter, Ritchie & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Texas Power & Light Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Armstrong v. Ames & Frost Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Temple Grocer Co. v. ClabaughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API