Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Ames & Frost Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. W. D. Harris.

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

On December 24, 1894, Ames-& Frost Co. brought suit against the F. H. Collins Co., a private corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas, and conducting a mercantile business in the city of Fort Worth. Plaintiff caused a writ of attachment to be levied upon the property of the F. H. Collins Co. One H. H. Fulton, the agent of the Ames & Frost Co., made the affidavit in attachment, alleging an indebtedness in the principal sum of $9673.19, and in the further sum of $127.61 interest; and further alleging, among other matters not necessary to mention, “that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. A. S. Valentine & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. P. W. Gallagher & Co. v. Goldfrank, Frank & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  3. Block, Oppenheimer & Co. v. Sweeney & CoombsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Gregg & Son v. W. D. Cleveland & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clayton v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API