Legal Opinion
Wirtz v. Mayer Construction Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 24, 1968No. Civ. 692-66PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, District Judge:
The primary issue requiring determination is whether, under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, the “enterprise concept” relating to local businesses handling goods which had moved in interstate commerce is a proper exercise by Congress of its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce ; 1 and, if so, whether it is applicable to defendants, Mayer Construction Co. and Barnegat Light Development Co., by imposing upon them an obligation for the payment of overtime compensation pursuant to the wage and hour provisions of the Act.
The matter…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Brookhaven Manor Water Co., Defendant-Counter-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- John T. Dunlop, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Industrial America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Shultz v. Deane-Hill Country Club, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
- Marshall v. WhiteheadDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
- Irby v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.