Yardley v. Iowa Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.
The first and essential proposition presented by this appeal involves the terms and provisions of the oral contract of employment between plaintiff and defendant. That the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant company as a stoker at its gas plant is not m dispute. The primary denial on the part of the company concerns the claim of the plaintiff that he was to be paid for his time in service in excess of an 8-hour day and the evidence in this particular is in sharp conflict.
Plaintiff testifies that the manager of the defendant company told him when he re-entered upon his work on April…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Farmers Savings Bank v. AldrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- E. A. Higley & Co. v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Thompson v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bremhorst v. Phillips Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- McGuire v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- In Re Estate of GollobitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- State v. AmrineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- D. F. Hallowell & Sons v. Van ZettenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931