Legal Opinion

State v. Amrine

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 11, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

— But one question concerns us upon this appeal. Sometime prior to the institution of the present proceeding, appellee paid to the complaining witness $75 in money, and at said time the complainant executed and delivered to appellee a written instrument, as follows:

“Whereas, Lióla Garnett claims that she is now in the family way as a result of intercourse with Ray Amrine, but she expressly admits that she does not claim that said Ray Amrine has been guilty of any crime by reason thereof; and,
“Whereas, said Ray Amrine denies the claims of said Lióla Garnett but is willing to pay seventy-five…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Farmers Savings Bank v. AldrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Black Hawk County v. CotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. E. A. Higley & Co. v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Mundt v. MeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. In Re Estate of GollobitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API