Legal Opinion
State v. Amrine
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 11, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
— But one question concerns us upon this appeal. Sometime prior to the institution of the present proceeding, appellee paid to the complaining witness $75 in money, and at said time the complainant executed and delivered to appellee a written instrument, as follows:
“Whereas, Lióla Garnett claims that she is now in the family way as a result of intercourse with Ray Amrine, but she expressly admits that she does not claim that said Ray Amrine has been guilty of any crime by reason thereof; and,
“Whereas, said Ray Amrine denies the claims of said Lióla Garnett but is willing to pay seventy-five…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Farmers Savings Bank v. AldrichSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Black Hawk County v. CotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- E. A. Higley & Co. v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- State ex rel. Mundt v. MeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. StevensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- In Re Estate of GollobitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942