Legal Opinion
General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Capital Discount, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 1960No. 2632PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
This appeal is from a summary judgment against appellant in an action brought by it for conversion of an automobile. The facts are not in dispute.
On February 16, 1959, one Naim R. Rafidi purchased the used car in question from Gibson Buick of Garfield County, Oklahoma, and executed a conditional sale contract in favor of his vendor. Gibson Buick, which held the original certificate of title as assignee, reassigned the title to Rafidi but did not note on the certificate that title was subject to the conditional bill of sale. On March 21, 1959, Rafidi filed with the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adkisson v. WaitmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- General Finance Corporation v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. FinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Wren v. Bankers Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Chiplock v. Steuart Motor Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Stuart v. ClarkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stuart v. ClarkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993