Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Clarke
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 1993No. 87-CV-952Published
1Opinion of the Court
619 A.2d 1199 (1993)
James A. STUART, Appellant,
v.
Cecil O. CLARKE and Farid Srour, Appellees.
No. 87-CV-952.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Submitted March 29, 1989.
Decided February 12, 1993.
James A. Stuart, filed a brief pro se.
Jeffrey M. Hamberger, Rockville, MD., and Jacob A. Kamerow, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellees.
Before FERREN and TERRY, Associate Judges and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.
2Per curiam
Appellant (the seller) contracted to sell real property to appellees (the buyers). At the time of contract, the seller knew that the land records showed there was an unreleased 1948…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Wagman v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Paul v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Cradock v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Lechner v. HallingWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Ferguson v. CasparDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.