Tenneco Inc. v. Saxony Bar & Tube, Inc., Appeal of First Interstate Commercial Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
First Interstate Commercial Corp. (FICC) tried to intervene in a suit in which it was already a defendant. Instead of gently telling FICC that once is enough, the district court denied the application. FICC immediately appealed, relying on cases characterizing as “final” and appealable denials of intervention as of right. E.g., Sam Fox Publishing Co. v. United States, 366 U.S. 683, 687-88, 81 S.Ct. 1309, 1311-12, 6 L.Ed.2d 604 (1961). The premise of these cases is that the denial of intervention ends the litigation for the would-be intervenor. Because the putative…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- National Metalcrafters v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of United of America Bank v. Rabbi Mordecai Elefant, Itri Torah Research Institute and Erwin WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- In the Matter of Fbn Food Services, Inc., Debtor. River Bank AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Intercon Solutions, Inc. v. Basel Action NetworkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Dimmitt & Owens Financial, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.