Legal Opinion

Texas Finance & Thift Ass'n v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 4, 1949No. 14090PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

The appeal is from an order of February 21, 1949, granting temporary injunction, after a hearing, under authority of Art. 4646b, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., commonly referred to as the Anti-Usury Injunction Law. In interest of brevity, reference is made to Watts v. Mann, Tex.Civ.App., 187 S.W.2d 917, writ refused, for text of the statute, in which instance it was -held constitutional.

As basis for invoking provisions of aforesaid statute, appellee, the State, through Dallas County District Attorney, in petition filed February 2, 1949, alleged five separate violations as related to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. James v. E. Weinstein & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Watts v. MannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Ex Parte Emory H. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Wilkenfeld v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. State v. Robb & Rowley United, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oil Field Haulers Ass'n v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Cardinal Health Staffing Network, Inc. v. Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Dallas Independent School District v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Hatridge v. Home Life & Accident Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API