Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1894No. 11,609PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PPEAL from the Fifth District Court, Parish of Ouachita. Potts, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Breaux, J.

The accused, charged with forgery and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment in the State penitentiary, complains that the judge refused to instruct the jury, as follows:

First. The mere false making, without an interest to defraud some one, does not constitute the crime of forgery.

Second. The intent to defraud is the very essence of the offence.

Third. To constitute forgery the instrument when forged must be such as would tend to prejudice the rights of another, and such in law as would be available to work the intended fraud or injury, the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. City of Lafayette v. TrahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. State v. GuidorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. State v. WhittakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  5. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API