Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1924No. 26684PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the WHOLE COURT.

ST. PAUL, J.

Jerome Smith and Ike Watson were convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling house in the nighttime with intent to steal. Smith alone appeals. He brings up four bills of exception, as follows:

Bill of Exception No. 1.

He complains : That the trial judge allowed evidence to go to the jury showing that at the time of their arrest defendants had in their possession a package of butter and eg'gs apparently the property of some person residing near the scene of the alleged burglary ; that they were not on trial for stealing said butter and eggs, and said testimony…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. State v. RiniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  4. State v. CraigheadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  5. State v. BatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. State v. NorphlisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  5. State v. BurksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API