Norton v. Ransome-Crummey Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Dissent
SHAW, J., Dissenting.—I dissent.
I am of the opinion that if matters of common knowledge were considered in connection with the facts proven, and all reasonable inferences therefrom indulged in favor of the action of the court below, there is enough evidence to support the finding that the defendant did not exercise reasonable care to protect the basement of plaintiff from injury in case of the rain then threatening. This, in my view, is the only question in the case. Being a question of fact, and as the evidence may be different upon a new trial, I should deem it useless to express my dissent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. LarsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Crommelin v. CoxeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Shields v. Orr Extension Ditch Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1897
- Stanford v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Paolini v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.