Legal Opinion

State v. Ofstedahl

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 27, 2004No. 2 CA-CR 2003-0080-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Pursuant to a plea agreement, petitioner Virginia Louise Ofstedahl pled guilty to four counts of aggravated driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI) while her license was suspended or revoked and two counts of endangerment. The trial court imposed a combination of concurrent and consecutive, aggravated sentences totaling fifteen years. Ofstedahl sought to have that plea agreement vacated and the original charges reinstated in a petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ariz. R.Crim. P., 17 A.R.S., arguing that permitting some…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. WattonArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SZPYRKACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. State of Arizona v. Eslyn Adrian VillaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Steven D. SzpyrkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API