Legal Opinion

Robintech, Inc. v. Chemidus Wavin, Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 11, 1980No. Nos. 78-1906, 78-1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Judge NICHOLS.

Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

NICHOLS, Judge:

This appeal brings for review the final judgment in a declaratory judgment action brought under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202 by plaintiff Robintech, Inc. (hereinafter “Robintech”) and counterclaim by defendant Chemidus Wavin, Ltd. (hereinafter “Chemidus”), wherein, following a nonjury trial and due deliberation, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held defendant’s U.S. Patent No. 3,484,900 (hereinafter “Sands-Broome patent”) invalid and misused. Robintech, Inc. v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Visking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  2. Robintech, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Chemidus Wavin, Limited, a British Corporation, Robintech, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Chemidus Wavin, Limited, a British CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API