Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1979No. 10578PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was tried and convicted on charges of first-degree murder (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2401) and possession of a prohibited weapon (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-3214(a)). He asserts the trial court erred in permitting the government to use his post-arrest statement for the purpose of impeaching him by showing he omitted therefrom facts that were included in his trial testimony. We hold that appellant’s argument equating this situation with cases holding that it is. constitutionally impermissible to impeach a defendant with his post-arrest silence misconstrues the factual situation here and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. WestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Hunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Beale v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Dixon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API