Village of Essexville v. Emery
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Bay. (Cobb, J.) Bill to remove an encroachment from a highway. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The bill is filed in this case to compel the defendant to move his fence in front of lots 3 and 4, block 1, of Grier, McDonell & Scheurmann’s addition to the village of Essexville, from what is claimed to be a street. On the hearing in the court below the court dismissed the bill. Complainant appeals.
The complainant became an incorporated village under Act No. 204, Local Acts of 1883, having the powers and duties provided for incorporated villages by Act No. 62 of the Session. Laws of 1875. The complainant claims that the fence in question encroaches upon the street; that the street was laid…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Weber v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Pastorino v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Mt. Clemens v. Mt. Clemens Sanitarium Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Moon v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Darrow v. Village of HomerMichigan Supreme Court · 1899