Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Adcock

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided May 3, 2007No. 06-0714/AFPublished

1Dissent

STUCKY, Judge, with whom RYAN, Judge,

joins (dissenting):

At trial, the military judge granted Appellant day-for-day credit for each of the 157 days she spent in pretrial confinement, as required by United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (C.M.A.1984). Appellant moved the court to grant additional pretrial confinement credit because, contrary to Air Force Instr. 31-205, The Air Force Corrections System (Apr. 7, 2004) [hereinafter AFI 31-205], while confined in a civilian facility, she was housed with post-conviction inmates and was not permitted to wear her military battle dress uniform (BDU). The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API