Legal Opinion

McKinnie v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Writ 'of Error to the Circuit Court, for Washington County. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the' court.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, C. J.

The plaintiffs in error were indicted, tried and convicted at the Spring term, 1901, of the Circuit Court for Washington county of the crime of living together in an open state of adultery, and from the sentences imposed seek relief on writ of error returnable to the present term of this court.

The only error assigned is the denial of the defendants’ motion for new trial. This motion was based upon the following grounds: 1st. That the verdict is unsupported by the evidence. 2nd. That the verdict is contrary to the evidence. 3rd. That the verdict is contrary to the charge of the court. 4th.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Duncan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  3. Warrace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  4. Leslie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  5. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Lowman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Hopkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. Sagonias v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API