Legal Opinion

Birmingham News Co. v. Little

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 25, 1933No. 6 Div. 283PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

We think that the proof established a private nuisance or one as to which the plaintiff suffered a special injury different in kind from the public generally. The evidence tended to show that his yard, or premises, was constantly and continuously littered with paper either thrown, or negligently permitted to escape, by those charged with the handling of the defendant’s papers. This, of itself, though the damage may have been trifling, put the trial court in error in giving the general charge for the defendant and justified granting the motion for a new trial. It is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. 1st Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. BaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Gilmer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. BarclaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Boriss v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Mutual Service Funeral Homes v. FehlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Campbell v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Phillips v. DerrickAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API