Estate of Scott
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco settling the final account of a special administrator. James M. Trontt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Appellant filed his final account as special administrator in the above-entitled estate. One Bachel, a creditor, filed written objections thereto. Upon the hearing of the nineteenth day of May, 1898, the court struck out and disallowed the item of two hundred and sixty-two dollars claimed to have been paid for rent, reduced the attorney’s fee from one hundred dollars to fifty dollars, and the fees of the administrator from thirty-five dollars and sixty-three cents to seventeen dollars and eighty cents, and allowed the account as to all other items. From this order the appeal is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McKay v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1892
- Wetherbee v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Estate of CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Kleinschmidt v. McAndrewsMontana Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCarty v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Ford & Sanborn Co. v. Braslan Seed Growers Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Gardner v. StareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937