Legal Opinion

Brougham Casket & Vault Co. v. DeLoach

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 9, 2013No. A13A1096PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Presiding Judge.

In this suit on an open commercial account, the registered agent of defendant Brougham Casket & Vault Company, LLC (“Brougham”), who was not an attorney, signed and served Brougham’s responses to the plaintiff’s requests for admission. Concluding that Brougham could only be represented in the litigation by an attorney, the trial court ruled that the responses were defective and struck them. The trial court further ruled that the plaintiff’s requests for admission were deemed admitted by Brougham by operation of law; that *702Brougham had failed to properly seek to withdraw…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Eckles v. Atlanta Technology Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Chandler v. OPENSIDED MRI OF ATLANTA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Winzer v. EHCA DUNWOODY, LLC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Fox Run Properties, LLC v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Turner v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monolith Companies, LLC v. Hunter Douglas Hospitality, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Trentiss Mitchell v. Hig Realty Credit Fund, Lp in Care of Meagan BurgessCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API