Legal Opinion
Kalvar Corp. v. Burrow
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1973No. 25969PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
From an adverse ruling on his motion to quash garnishment under a judgment entered against him in 1969, the judgment debtor appeals. The ground for the motion to quash was that collection of the judgment is barred by a discharge in bankruptcy granted to appellant on December 8, 1970. The determinative issue is whether the judgment creditor’s claim is of a nature barred from discharge by § 17(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Act.
The underlying facts are these. Appellant operated as a franchise distributor for S. O. Systems, a subsidiary of respondent, until June 30, 1966. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Tinker v. ColwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Clair v. ColmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Baker v. Bryant Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thummel v. ThummelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Baker v. Riss International Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Peters v. Zoda (In re Zoda)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1980