Legal Opinion
Clair v. Colmes
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1923PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.
The bill in equity alleges, in substance, that in the course of certain transactions the plaintiff entrusted to the defendant, Max Colmes (hereinafter called the defendant), certain diamonds and jewelry, valued at approximately $4,020, the title of which was to remain in the plaintiff; that they were to be sold in Rutland, Vermont, and accounted for to the plaintiff with a ten per cent profit; that after the sale the plaintiff at Boston demanded the return of his merchandise, but the defendant reported that he had been robbed of said property. The bill also avers “ that said diamonds and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- McIntyre v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Upshur v. BriscoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cronan v. CottingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Shea v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- MacLennan v. MacLennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Bank Calumet v. Whiters (In Re Whiters)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
- Bamco 18 v. Reeves (In Re Reeves)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.