Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. C. H. Benton, Inc. v. Roelof Construction Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1969No. 22639PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHELAN, District Judge:
This is an appeal by a Miller Act use plaintiff from a judgment of the U. S. District Court in favor of defendants. The defendants and appellees are Roelof Construction Company, which purchased painting materials from the use plaintiff for use on the government contract covered by the Miller Act bond, and Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York.
The use plaintiff had supplied defendant Roelof Construction Company, hereinafter Roelof, with painting materials for a period of about one and one-half years to two years prior to June of 1966 and up to at least June 20, 1966.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consolidated Electric Co. v. United States of America for Use and Benefit of Gough Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States of America for the Use of Dakota Electric Supply Company, Anorth Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Columbia Digger Co. v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Rose Wong and Kent Wong v. Walter Swier and Laura SwierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- School District of Springfield R-12 Ex Rel. Midland Paving Co. v. Transamerica Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Maxwell Macmillan Realization Liquidating Trust v. Aboff (In re Macmillan Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- United States v. Roelof Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- In Re MacMillan Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Reliance v. LOTT GROUPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.