Legal Opinion
United States v. Roelof Construction Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1969No. 22639PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
418 F.2d 1328
The UNITED STATES of America, FOR the USE AND BENEFIT OF C.
H. BENTON, INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROELOF CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, doing business as Truett
Painting Company; and Fidelity and Casualty
Company of New York, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 22639.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 1, 1969.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Electric Co. v. United States of America for Use and Benefit of Gough Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States of America for the Use of Dakota Electric Supply Company, Anorth Dakota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Columbia Digger Co. v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Rose Wong and Kent Wong v. Walter Swier and Laura SwierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Church of Scientology v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Palmer Supply Co. v. Walsh & Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- United States Ex Rel. Owens-Corning Fiber-Glas Corp. v. Brandt Construction Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1984
- United States v. Wibco, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.