Ronald L. Wagner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant is dissatisfied with his Selective Service classification of 1-A.
With one exception, the painstaking and exhaustive decision of the trial judge, D.C., 292 F.Supp. 1 thoroughly analyzes and correctly decides each of the issues argued on appeal. The exception was not raised in the trial court. For that reason, we could brush it aside and refuse to consider inasmuch as we are not convinced that an injustice has been done appellant. Hansberry v. United States, 295 F.2d 800 (9th Cir. 1961) ; Beadnell v. United States, 303 F.2d 87 (9th Cir. 1962); Gilbert v. United States, 307 F.2d 322…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- George Gilbert and Jess Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Dean R. Hansberry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Eugene W. Beadnell v. United States of America, Gary S. Clemens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. WagnerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Donnell Leonard Luster v. Colonel William H. McBeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- United States v. CaseDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972