Legal Opinion
Eugene W. Beadnell v. United States of America, Gary S. Clemens v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1962No. 17525_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
On November 22, 1960, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, two informations were filed—one against Eugene W. Beadnell and one against Gary S. Clemens. Each information was in four counts.
Count 1 of the Beadnell information alleged, in substance, that on December 26, 1958, in San Francisco, California, Beadnell knowingly and willfully made a false statement to the Railroad Retirement Board for the purpose of obtaining unemployment benefits under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 351-367,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sonnenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Barnard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
- Stephens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
- Merritt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Charles H. Rutherford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Dear Wing Jung v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Ronald L. Wagner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Robert E. HelinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.